Skip to content

Conversation

Rageking8
Copy link
Contributor

@Rageking8 Rageking8 commented Sep 22, 2022

Fixes #101540

r? @TaKO8Ki

Not sure If I have done it right.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 22, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 22, 2022
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

TaKO8Ki commented Sep 26, 2022

Thanks! @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 26, 2022

📌 Commit c66c2e8 has been approved by TaKO8Ki

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 26, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2022
…fee1-dead

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102143 (Recover from struct nested in struct)
 - rust-lang#102178 (bootstrap: the backtrace feature is stable, no need to allow it any more)
 - rust-lang#102197 (Stabilize const `BTree{Map,Set}::new`)
 - rust-lang#102267 (Don't set RUSTC in the bootstrap build script)
 - rust-lang#102270 (Remove benches from `rustc_middle`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0adf293 into rust-lang:master Sep 26, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Sep 26, 2022
@Rageking8 Rageking8 deleted the fix-101540 branch September 27, 2022 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add note that struct declaration within a struct is not allowed
5 participants